more than 13,000 districts across the country, and found that nearly half of all high-poverty schools receive at least 10% less funding than the average amount of funding for schools in their district.  This is despite the fact that high poverty schools are generally more expensive to operate.  Title 1 funds that are no longer an additional source of funding for students who are less fortunate because their original intentions.  In countries such as North Carolina, they were used to fill budget gaps by contrast.

According to reports, the principal difference is the level of funding is different that the teachers are paid in different schools.  Many countries, including North Carolina, providing funding for a number of teaching positions in each school and then pay that amount of salary for each school, regardless of how much salaries can vary from school to school.  High poverty schools tend to have teachers who are less experienced and have teaching credentials and are therefore paid less; the high school of wealth tend to have the most experienced and highly credentialed teachers who were paid more.  Perversely, high poverty schools receive less money for high school teachers than wealth.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan to believe one way to overcome this problem is to close the "loophole comparability point" in primary and secondary education Act (ESEA) requires that the District provides high poverty schools share the same State and local dollars as other schools before the district can be title I dollars for disadvantaged students.  Currently stalled bipartisan legislation reauthorizing the USA ESEA, sponsored by Sens. Tom Harkin and Russ Cochran, including language that is designed to close this gap.

style='display:block;float:left;width:100%'>

Some experts have raised the possibility. Last summer, Moody's Analytics pronounced fear of education spending bubble "is not without merit." Last spring, investor and PayPal founder Peter Thiel called attention to his education by awarding bubbles two dozen young entrepreneurs $ 100,000 each not to attend college.

The last few weeks have seen a flood of "bubble" News-student loan default, other 8.3 percent tuition rose this year and last, out Thursday, a new report estimates that the average student debt for borrowers from the College class of 2010 has passed $ 25,000. And all that on top of a multi-year slump in the job market for recent college graduates.

So those who warn of bubbles have a case?

College debt debate

The hard part, of course, is that not clear until the bubble burst. But the short answer is this: there is a trend that is worrying. The title is an asset whose value can be changed from time to time. Loans to pay for it risky and loans up to do. The stakes are high. You can usually run away from home. Not so student loans, which could not even run out of bankruptcy.

But there is also an important distinction between the potential "student loans bubble" and "the education bubble." In addition, many economists think the whole concept of bubble misleading way to think about what's going on, and really can distract from the real issues. College affordability is a serious problem, but it is different. Loans for College and borrow, say, a House, fundamentally different in important ways.

To be sure, there are some warning signs: Classic bubble

-Everybody wants. The idea that higher education is the only way to go forward to be widely embraced. College enrollment has surged to one-third in a decade. With the increasing demand, college tuition and fees have more than doubled during that time, in fact the inflation in every other sector of the economy–the main energy, health and housing, even when the housing is bubbling itself.

–Bill paid for with borrowed money. Regular student loan Volume increased rapidly and now exceed credit card debt, though some reports that crossed the $ 1 trillion may be premature. Moody's Analytics put the number at about $ 750 billion. But while declining credit card debt, student loan debt continues to rise.

–Such as housing, student loans are a lot done with little or no research into Whether the borrower the right fit. Federal Stafford loans are essentially automatic for students, and support for other types of loans the Government giving another student lenders little reason to picky.

-Default on federal student loans jumped from 7 percent 8.8 percent in the current fiscal year. That measure the borrower only recently that's been behind in the two years they first payment came due.

The figures were all worrying. But put them in the context of the need to think independently about the ideas of "student loan bubble" and "the education bubble."

First, the one thing that is important about student loan bubble is that it might pose much less of a threat than the housing debt to drag down the entire economy. Yes, a lot of individual borrowers can find themselves in trouble. But the amount of student loan may amount to less than 10 percent of outstanding mortgages. Any one student loan default can and it still may not match the total mortgage defaults during the recent downturn. More importantly, unlike other mortgages, Wall Street not knee-deep in securities that comprise the student loan packages, such as a mortgage. (It also helps that it is also difficult to speculate in student loans; investors can flip houses, but not the brain.)

Another major difference with student loans is the dominant role the federal Government has assumed in the market in recent years: it accounts for about 85 percent of student debt.

If You believe this comment is offensive or violates the terms of CBSNews.com, You can report it below (this will not automatically remove the comment). Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed.